Skip to main content
SleepCited

メラトニン 時差ぼけ

A

合計516名の参加者を対象とした57件の研究(メタアナリシス6件、RCT 2件を含む)に基づく。57件中35件の研究で肯定的な効果が示されている。

<\/script>\n
`; }, get iframeSnippet() { const domain = 'sleepcited.com'; const params = 'ingredient\u003Dmelatonin\u0026condition\u003Djet\u002Dlag'; return ``; }, get activeSnippet() { return this.method === 'script' ? this.scriptSnippet : this.iframeSnippet; }, copySnippet() { navigator.clipboard.writeText(this.activeSnippet).then(() => { this.copied = true; setTimeout(() => { this.copied = false; }, 2000); }); } }" @keydown.escape.window="open = false" @click.outside="open = false">

Embed This Widget

Style



      
      
    

Widget powered by . Free, no account required.

A

結論

Melatonin is well-supported by research as a supplement that may help your body adjust to new time zones and reduce jet lag symptoms.

  • 57 studies including 6 meta-analyses support melatonin for jet lag
  • Timing matters — taking melatonin near target bedtime at your destination may work best
  • One of the most widely recognized and studied uses for melatonin
  • About 61% of studies show clearly positive effects on jet lag symptoms

Key Study Findings

Review
Melatonin dose and timing: Do we have it right?
Dose: None vs: None Outcome: None 効果: None None

対象集団: Review of melatonin dose and timing

In Vitro
Exogenous L-Cysteine and Its Transport Through CtaP Play a Role in Biofilm Formation, Swimming Motility, …
Dose: 1.57 and 3.67 mM vs: Basal defined media without L-cysteine Outcome: Biofilm formation and motility of L. monocytogenes 効果: None None

対象集団: Listeria monocytogenes 10403S and ctaP mutant

review
Therapeutic Dilemma: Melatonin or not?
Dose: low doses melatonin (unspecified); melatonin for jet lag (adults) vs: Placebo 効果: None None
Controlled Clinical Trial n=24 2 weeks
D-Ribose-L-Cysteine protects against sodium arsenite-induced hepato-nephrotoxicity in rats.
Dose: 10 mg/kg body weight vs: Sodium arsenite group (SA, no riboceine) Outcome: Hepato-nephrotoxicity markers (ALT, AST, creatinine) 効果: None None

対象集団: Rats with sodium arsenite-induced toxicity

Other
Melatonin-Loaded Hydrogel Modulates Circadian Rhythms and Alleviates Oxidative Stress and Inflammation to Promote Wound Healing.
Dose: None vs: Wounds without hydrogel Outcome: Wound healing and circadian rhythm modulation 効果: None None

対象集団: Animal wound model with circadian disruption

Observational Study n=140
Association between behavioral jet lag with subjective and objective circadian rhythm among Chinese young adults.
Dose: None vs: Low behavioral jet lag group Outcome: rMEQ score and DLMO timing 効果: 1h social jet lag: -2.27 rMEQ, +24min DLMO delay <0.05

対象集団: Chinese young adults (mean age 20.7, 60% women)

Key Statistics

108

研究数

676

参加者数

Mixed

A

グレード

Referenced Papers

CNS spectrums 2025 1 件の引用
Paediatrics & child … 2025
Children (Basel, Switzerland) 2024 1 件の引用
Archives of physiology … 2022 69 件の引用
Current neuropharmacology 2022 40 件の引用
Journal of environmental … 2022 9 件の引用
Biomolecules 2021 280 件の引用
Chronobiology international 2021 47 件の引用
Critical reviews in … 2021 3 件の引用
Journal of biological … 2020 110 件の引用
British journal of … 2020 56 件の引用
Human brain mapping 2020 15 件の引用
Drug and therapeutics … 2020 1 件の引用
International journal of … 2019 29 件の引用
The Medical letter … 2019
General and comparative … 2018 136 件の引用
Travel medicine and … 2018 27 件の引用
Praxis 2018 1 件の引用
Current biology : … 2017 455 件の引用
Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn.) 2017 132 件の引用
FP essentials 2017 15 件の引用
European heart journal. … 2016 77 件の引用
Diabetes, obesity & … 2015 132 件の引用
Diabetes & metabolism 2015 112 件の引用
Sleep medicine clinics 2015 75 件の引用
Medwave 2015 6 件の引用
Jet lag. Systematic Review
BMJ clinical evidence 2014
Current pharmaceutical design 2014
Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn.) 2013 172 件の引用
Profiles of drug … 2013 26 件の引用
Nihon rinsho. Japanese … 2013
Chronobiology international 2012 1248 件の引用
Cancer letters 2012 108 件の引用
Cleveland Clinic journal … 2011 73 件の引用
Anaesthesia and intensive … 2011 18 件の引用
La Revue de … 2011 3 件の引用
Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie 2011
Journal of pineal … 2011
The New England … 2010 130 件の引用
Expert review of … 2010 58 件の引用
The International journal … 2010 55 件の引用
International journal of … 2010 5 件の引用
Current treatment options … 2010
Current medicinal chemistry 2010
Sleep medicine reviews 2009 141 件の引用
Travel medicine and … 2009 101 件の引用
Travel medicine and … 2009 60 件の引用
Seminars in neurology 2009 17 件の引用
Tidsskrift for den … 2009 6 件の引用
Drug and therapeutics … 2009
Arzneimittel-Forschung 2008 89 件の引用
Saudi medical journal 2008
Jet lag. Systematic Review
BMJ clinical evidence 2008
Lancet (London, England) 2007 405 件の引用
Sleep medicine 2007 201 件の引用
Cellular and molecular … 2007 88 件の引用
The American journal … 2007 3 件の引用
Beating jet lag. Case Report
British journal of … 2007
The FEBS journal 2006 56 件の引用
Chronobiology international 2006
Tidsskrift for den … 2006
Jet lag. Review
Clinical evidence 2005
Bulletin de l'Academie … 2005
Journal of sports … 2004 135 件の引用
Seminars in neurology 2004 16 件の引用
Jet lag. Review
Clinical evidence 2004
Alternative therapies in … 2004
Jet lag. Review
Clinical evidence 2004
Best practice & … 2003 339 件の引用
BMJ (Clinical research … 2003 51 件の引用
Sports medicine (Auckland, … 2003
Health news (Waltham, … 2003
The Cochrane database … 2002 154 件の引用
Maturitas 2002 59 件の引用
Neuro endocrinology letters 2002
Experimental gerontology 2001 178 件の引用
The Cochrane database … 2001 154 件の引用
Air medical journal 2001 12 件の引用
Ugeskrift for laeger 2001
Novartis Foundation symposium 2000 47 件の引用
Reproduction, nutrition, development 1999 64 件の引用
Biological signals and … 1999 48 件の引用
Current treatment options … 1999 23 件の引用
European journal of … 1999
Annals of medicine 1998 49 件の引用
Postgraduate medical journal 1998 17 件の引用
British journal of … 1998 17 件の引用
Drug and therapeutics … 1998 3 件の引用
Nihon rinsho. Japanese … 1998
Journal of biological … 1997 255 件の引用
Chronobiology international 1997 135 件の引用
Medecine tropicale : … 1997
The Netherlands journal … 1996 13 件の引用
Journal of psychiatry … 1994 118 件の引用
Biological psychiatry 1993 25 件の引用
Duodecim; laaketieteellinen aikakauskirja 1991
Occupational medicine (Philadelphia, … 1990
Lancet (London, England) 1986 13 件の引用
Lancet (London, England) 1986
British medical journal … 1983
Microbiology and immunology 1982 41 件の引用
British medical journal … 1982

Dosage & Usage

mg = milligrams · mcg = micrograms (1,000× smaller) · IU = International Units

一般的な使用量

general:
0.5-3 mg, 30-60 min before bed
jetlag:
0.5-5 mg

上限量: No established UL; 5 mg typically considered maximum

研究で検討された用量

用量 期間 効果 N
None -- Mixed --
1.57 and 3.67 mM -- Mixed --
low doses melatonin (unspecified); melatonin for jet lag (adults) -- Positive --
10 mg/kg body weight 2 weeks Positive 24
None -- Positive --
None -- Negative 140
None -- Positive --
None -- Neutral --

推奨摂取タイミング: 30-60 minutes before bed

Safety & Side Effects

報告されている副作用

  • Daytime drowsiness
  • Headache
  • Dizziness
  • Nausea
  • Vivid dreams or nightmares

既知の相互作用

  • Blood thinners (warfarin) — may increase bleeding risk
  • Immunosuppressants — melatonin may stimulate immune function
  • Diabetes medications — may affect blood sugar levels
  • Sedatives and CNS depressants — additive drowsiness

耐容上限摂取量: No established UL; 5 mg typically considered maximum

サプリメントの摂取を開始する前に、必ず医療専門家にご相談ください。

Frequently Asked Questions

Does メラトニン help with 時差ぼけ?
Based on 108 studies with 676 participants, there is strong evidence from multiple clinical trials that メラトニン may support 時差ぼけ management. Our evidence grade is A (Strong Evidence).
How much メラトニン should I take for 時差ぼけ?
Studies have used various dosages. A commonly studied range is 0.5-3 mg, 30-60 min before bed. Always consult your healthcare provider before starting any supplement regimen.
Are there side effects of メラトニン?
Reported side effects may include Daytime drowsiness, Headache, Dizziness, Nausea. Most side effects are mild and dose-dependent. Consult your doctor if you experience any adverse reactions.
How strong is the evidence for メラトニン and 時差ぼけ?
We rate the evidence as Grade A (Strong Evidence). This rating is based on 108 peer-reviewed studies with 676 total participants. The overall direction of effect is mixed.

Related Evidence

FDAに関する免責事項: これらの記述は米国食品医薬品局(FDA)による評価を受けていません。本ウェブサイトの製品および情報は、疾病の診断、治療、治癒、または予防を目的としたものではありません。表示されているエビデンスグレードは、公開された査読済み研究の分析に基づいており、医療上の助言を構成するものではありません。サプリメントの摂取を開始する前に、必ず医療専門家にご相談ください。