Skip to main content
SleepCited

Estimation of the melatonin suppression index through clear and yellow-tinted intraocular lenses.

Ichiya Sano, Masaki Tanito, Tsutomu Okuno, Yoshihisa Ishiba, Akihiro Ohira
Other Japanese journal of ophthalmology 2014 3 citations
PubMed DOI
<\/script>\n
`; }, get iframeSnippet() { const domain = 'sleepcited.com'; const params = 'pmid\u003D24777840'; return ``; }, get activeSnippet() { return this.method === 'script' ? this.scriptSnippet : this.iframeSnippet; }, copySnippet() { navigator.clipboard.writeText(this.activeSnippet).then(() => { this.copied = true; setTimeout(() => { this.copied = false; }, 2000); }); } }" @keydown.escape.window="open = false" @click.outside="open = false">

Embed This Widget

Style



      
      
    

Widget powered by . Free, no account required.

Study Design

Study Type
In Vitro
Population
13 IOL models (computational study)
Intervention
Estimation of the melatonin suppression index through clear and yellow-tinted intraocular lenses. None
Comparator
None
Primary Outcome
Melatonin suppression index (MSI)
Effect Direction
Neutral
Risk of Bias
Unclear

Abstract

PURPOSE: To estimate the melatonin suppression index (MSI), which may reflect the nonvisual photoreception function, through commercially available foldable, clear and yellow-tinted intraocular lenses (IOLs). METHODS: The MSIs for 13 IOL models (6 clear IOLs, 7 yellow-tinted IOLs) with three lens powers were calculated based on previously reported data about the melatonin suppression spectrum, spectral intensity of a 20-W white fluorescent lamp and spectral transmission of IOLs in wavelengths from 300 to 800 nm. The models tested were the SA60AT and SN60AT (Alcon Japan); the VA-60BBR, YA-60BBR, and NM-1 (Hoya); the AU6K and AN6K (Kowa); the N4-18B and N4-18YG (Nidek); the X-60 and NX-60 (Santen); and the KS-3Ai and KS-AiN (Staar Japan). RESULTS: The MSIs of the clear IOLs ranged from 1.12 to 1.18 mW cm(-2) sr(-1) and those of the yellow-tinted IOLs from 0.74 to 1.01 mW cm(-2) sr(-1). All yellow-tinted IOLs had significantly lower MSIs (P < 0.0001-0.0021) than the clear IOLs; the %MSI cutoff values for yellow-tinted IOLs compared to the clear IOLs were 11.4-36.2 %. The MSIs of the six clear IOLs did not differ based on lens powers (P = 0.2159-0.6144). Except for one IOL model, all yellow-tinted IOLs had a lower MSI with higher lens powers compared to those with lower lens powers (P < 0.0001-0.0055). Compared to phakic eyes (MSI, 1.03 mW cm(-2) sr(-1)), the MSIs of the clear IOLs were higher (%MSI cutoff, -14.6 to -8.4 %), whereas those of the yellow-tinted IOLs were lower (2.6-28.1 %). Compared to aphakic eyes (MSI, 1.21 mW cm(-2) sr(-1)), the MSIs of the clear (2.1-7.4 %) and yellow-tinted (16.7-38.6 %) IOLs were lower. CONCLUSIONS: Yellow-tinted IOLs absorb more circadian rhythm-associated light than clear IOLs. The difference in the lens power is significantly related to the MSI value in some yellow-tinted IOLs. To correlate the current data with the clinical relevance of these findings, the percent loss of the MSI leading to a circadian rhythm disorder needs to be clarified.

TL;DR

Yellow-tinted Iols absorb more circadian rhythm-associated light than clear IOLs and the difference in the lens power is significantly related to the melatonin suppression index (MSI), which may reflect the nonvisual photoreception function in some yellow-tinto intraocular lenses.

Used In Evidence Reviews

Similar Papers