NSW cannabis medicines advisory service retrospective enquiry analysis to inform clinical guidance resource development.
Study Design
- Jenis Studi
- Observational Study
- Ukuran Sampel
- 123
- Populasi
- Patients referred to NSW Cannabis Medicines Advisory Service
- Intervensi
- NSW cannabis medicines advisory service retrospective enquiry analysis to inform clinical guidance resource development. None
- Pembanding
- None
- Luaran Utama
- Cannabis prescribing patterns and clinical guidance
- Arah Efek
- Mixed
- Risiko Bias
- Moderate
Abstract
BACKGROUND: An innovative New South Wales government funded statewide Cannabis Medicines Advisory Service (CMAS) operated between January 2018 and June 2022. The service provided comprehensive patient-specific and evidence-based information to support health professionals in prescribing and patient care decisions. This study aimed to describe real-world data collected by CMAS. METHODS: A sub-set of de-identified, patient-specific enquiries collected between January 2021 and June 2022 (n = 123/567; 21.7%) were analyzed using R version 4.2.1. Diagnosis, indication, and comorbidities were coded using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) terminology. RESULTS: Most patient-specific enquiries from medical practitioners were from general practitioners (n = 103/123; 83.7%). Female (n = 53/123; 43.1%) and male (n = 59/123; 48.0%) patients were similarly represented. Sex was not specified for 8.9% (n = 11/123) of patients. The mean age of patients was 52.1 years (range <10-90). The most common three diagnoses were osteoarthritis, anxiety, and chronic pain. Indications that were most frequently reported included chronic pain, anxiety, back pain, non-neuropathic pain, and insomnia. Comedications were most commonly non-opioid and opioid analgesics and antidepressants. Most practitioners were considering prescribing a cannabidiol (CBD) product for their patient. Cannabinoid composition selection guidance provided by CMAS was predominantly (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol) THC:CBD ~1:1, followed by CBD-only products. CMAS was contacted by health professionals regarding the management of potential adverse events for five patients. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study shed light on the information medical practitioners were seeking to inform their clinical decision-making about medical cannabis and can inform the development of clinical guidance resources.
TL;DR
This study aimed to describe real‐world data collected by CMAS, which provided comprehensive patient‐specific and evidence‐based information to support health professionals in prescribing and patient care decisions.
Used In Evidence Reviews
Similar Papers
Current psychiatry reports · 2017
Cannabis, Cannabinoids, and Sleep: a Review of the Literature.
Archives of internal medicine · 2007
Vitamin B6, B12, and folic acid supplementation and cognitive function: a systematic review of randomized trials.
Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2012
Cannabidiol in humans-the quest for therapeutic targets.
Nutricion hospitalaria · 2015
NUTRITIONAL AND TOXICOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF SPIRULINA (ARTHROSPIRA).
CNS drugs · 2022
Psychobehavioural and Cognitive Adverse Events of Anti-Seizure Medications for the Treatment of Developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathies.
The Permanente journal · 2016