How to manage travel fatigue and jet lag in athletes? A systematic review of interventions.
Study Design
- Type d'étude
- Systematic Review
- Taille de l'échantillon
- 14
- Population
- Athletes
- Intervention
- How to manage travel fatigue and jet lag in athletes? A systematic review of interventions. None
- Comparateur
- None
- Critère de jugement principal
- None
- Direction de l'effet
- Mixed
- Risque de biais
- Unclear
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We investigated the management of travel fatigue and jet lag in athlete populations by evaluating studies that have applied non-pharmacological interventions (exercise, sleep, light and nutrition), and pharmacological interventions (melatonin, sedatives, stimulants, melatonin analogues, glucocorticoids and antihistamines) following long-haul transmeridian travel-based, or laboratory-based circadian system phase-shifts. DESIGN: Systematic review Eligibility criteria Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), and non-RCTs including experimental studies and observational studies, exploring interventions to manage travel fatigue and jet lag involving actual travel-based or laboratory-based phase-shifts. Studies included participants who were athletes, except for interventions rendering no athlete studies, then the search was expanded to include studies on healthy populations. DATA SOURCES: Electronic searches in PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Google Scholar and SPORTDiscus from inception to March 2019. We assessed included articles for risk of bias, methodological quality, level of evidence and quality of evidence. RESULTS: Twenty-two articles were included: 8 non-RCTs and 14 RCTs. No relevant travel fatigue papers were found. For jet lag, only 12 athlete-specific studies were available (six non-RCTs, six RCTs). In total (athletes and healthy populations), 11 non-pharmacological studies (participants 600; intervention group 290; four non-RCTs, seven RCTs) and 11 pharmacological studies (participants 1202; intervention group 870; four non-RCTs, seven RCTs) were included. For non-pharmacological interventions, seven studies across interventions related to actual travel and four to simulated travel. For pharmacological interventions, eight studies were based on actual travel and three on simulated travel. CONCLUSIONS: We found no literature pertaining to the management of travel fatigue. Evidence for the successful management of jet lag in athletes was of low quality. More field-based studies specifically on athlete populations are required with a multifaceted approach, better design and implementation to draw valid conclusions. PROSPERO registration number The protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42019126852).
En bref
Evidence for the successful management of jet lag in athletes was of low quality and more field-based studies specifically on athlete populations are required with a multifaceted approach, better design and implementation to draw valid conclusions.
Used In Evidence Reviews
Similar Papers
Journal of sleep research · 2017
European guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of insomnia.
Chronobiology international · 2012
Circadian typology: a comprehensive review.
Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2017
Clinical Practice Guideline for the Pharmacologic Treatment of Chronic Insomnia in Adults: An American Academy of Sleep Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline.
Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2011
The Movement Disorder Society Evidence-Based Medicine Review Update: Treatments for the non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease.
Cell · 1981
Regulation of terminal differentiation of cultured human keratinocytes by vitamin A.
Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2003