Predictive factors of restless leg syndrome in hemodialysis patients.
研究デザイン
- 研究タイプ
- Cross-sectional
- サンプルサイズ
- 104
- 対象集団
- 104 hemodialysis patients assessed using the International RLS Standard Questionnaire; individual, clinical, and laboratory indices (FBS, hepatitis B/C, BUN, creatinine, iron, hemoglobin, KT/V, URR) evaluated from patient files and interviews.
- 介入
- Predictive factors of restless leg syndrome in hemodialysis patients. None
- 比較対照
- None
- 主要アウトカム
- Prevalence and predictive factors of restless leg syndrome (RLS) in hemodialysis patients
- 効果の方向
- Positive
- バイアスリスク
- Moderate
抄録
INTRODUCTION: The restless leg syndrome (RLS) is a neurologic disorder suffering the hemodialysis patients. Although the pathophysiology of this syndrome remains unknown yet, an investigation of the parameters pertinent to it may help to develop the related medical knowledge and to improve the therapeutic-care interventions in this regard. OBJECTIVES: The correlation between the RLSs on individual, clinical, and laboratory indices in patients undergoing hemodialysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This descriptive-analytic study was conducted on 104 hemodialysis patients. Diagnosis of RLS was made using the International RLS Standard Questionnaire. The data on individual, clinical, and laboratory indices were obtained from patients' recorded files and interviews. RESULTS: Based on our findings, 28.8% of the patients undergoing hemodialysis were affected with mild RLS, 41.7% with moderate RLS, and 29.5% with severe RLS. There was a statistically significant correlation between affliction with RLS on the one hand, and age and gender, on the other (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant correlation between RLS and education level, occupation, length of hemodialysis, fasting blood sugar (FBS), hepatitis B and C, serum blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Cr), iron, hemoglobin (Hb) level and also KT/Vor URR (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Regarding the high prevalence of RLS among the hemodialysis patients, there is the necessity for taking more care of these patients to reduce the somatic complications of the RLS especially among the elderly and female patients and to control the blood sugar of these patients at the normal level.
要約
There is the necessity for taking more care of hemodialysis patients to reduce the somatic complications of the RLS especially among the elderly and female patients and to control the blood sugar of these patients at the normal level.
全文
Implication for health policy/practice/research/medical education:
In the current study, we assessed the effects of clinical and laboratory indices and their changes in restless leg syndrome in hemodialysis patients. It is known that several laboratory indices affect this syndrome. The elevated level of blood glucose in these patients, measurement of the blood glucose index in these patients seems mandatory.
Introduction
The restless leg syndrome (RLS) is a sensory-motor disturbance with increased inclination for moving the legs and sometimes other body organs accompanied by discomfort, distress, tingling, and numbness. It is aggravated with rest and lack of activity specifically during the night and relived with activity. Etiologically, it is divided into two types; type I or idiopathic RLS which usually follows a familial and genetic pattern, and type II which is associated with other disorders (
Objectives
Regarding the rate of prevalence of RLS in hemodialysis patients, the present investigation was carried out to investigate the impacts of clinical and laboratory indices and their changes in these patients. It is hoped that some meticulous steps would be taken to improve the symptoms of RLS through an awareness of the related factors and ultimately promote the life quality of these patients.
Patients and Methods
This descriptive-analytic study was conducted on 140 hemodialysis patients presenting to hospitals of Yazd, central Iran, during 2015. Having obtained informed written consent, the RLS was investigated in all hemodialysis patients via the International RLS Standard Questionnaire. This inventory consisted of 10 five-choice items each with a scale of 0-4 points (very severe, severe, moderate, mild, none). The severity of symptoms of this disorder were classified into five categories on the basis of acquired scores: without any problem (0 score), mild (1-10 score), moderate (11-20 score), severe (21-30 score), and very severe (31-40 score). Diagnosis of the RLS was established using the International RLS Standard Questionnaire. Further, the patients were examined by a nephrologist and a neurologist to exclude the differential diagnoses, so the included subjects suffered just from the RLS. Patients with a history of less than 3-month hemodialysis, a sensory-motor disorder, affliction with diabetic neuropathy, neurologic impairments, mental disorders, or affliction with cardiovascular diseases were excluded from the study. The data required for this section were gleaned with a three-section questionnaire. The first section of the questionnaire included demographic information such as age, gender, education, occupation, clinical information, and health history (i.e., cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, hypertension, hepatitis B, hepatitis C), length of hemodialysis, and analgesics consumption. Also, the second section included the laboratory indices. Seeing the regular performance of tests of hemodialysis patients by the hospital laboratories, the most recent clinical tests of these patients done in the intervals of hemodialysis, were considered in this study. The third section of the questionnaire was the standard screening instrument of the RLS introduced by the International Society of RLS Studies. Patients with the four criteria were rendered as RLS patients. The scientific credibility of the research instrument was established by the questionnaire reliability and validity estimation method presented by Habibzadeh et al and estimated to be 0.97 (
Ethical issues
1) The research followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki; 2) informed consent was obtained, and they were free to leave the study at any time and 3) the research was approved by the ethical committee of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services. To observe the ethical issues of research, the participating patients were informed of research process and objectives, and the questionnaires were filled out anonymously using interview by the researchers or by the use of patients’ records.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (version 16), statistical software package. In this study, descriptive statistics were used to analyze the demographic profiles of the participants. A
Results
A total of 139 patients including 54 females (38.8%) and 85 males (61.2%) were studied in this research. Forty patients suffered from mild RLS including 7 females (17.5%) and 33 males (82.5%), 58 patients had moderate RLS including 26 females (44.8%) and 32 males (55.2%), and 41 patients had severe RLS including 21 females (51.2%) and 20 males (48.8%). The prevalence of the syndrome in both genders was significantly different (
The length of hemodialysis period in patients with severe RLS and those with mild RLS was not significantly different (
As seen, 12 patients (30%) with mild RLS, 26 patients (44.8%) with moderate RLS, and 17 patients (41.5%) with severe RLS used benzodiazepines, tricycle antidepressants, and GABA analogues. There was, however, no significant correlation between consumption of these drugs and the presence of the syndrome (
Discussion
Compared to the general population, the RLS is more prevalent among patients with end-stage renal disease in both before and after dialysis phase (
Conclusion
The RLS is a common nuisance than a crippling disease among the chronic renal failure patients. Appropriate curative measures will promote the life quality of patients and improve their course of treatment. On The basis of the results of various studies, it is known that several laboratory indices affect this syndrome. Hence, it is logical to recommend the measurement and control of these indices. On the other hand, our findings demonstrated that the serum glucose level of patients with RLS is higher than that of patients without the syndrome though, of course, the difference was not significant. Considering the elevated level of blood glucose in these patients, measurement of the blood glucose index in these patients seems mandatory.
Limitations of the study
The limitation of the current study was relatively small sample size.
Acknowledgments
The author’s special thanks should go to the personnel and participating patients at Hemodialysis Ward of Shahid Rahnemoon Hospital in Yazd, Ziayee Hospital in Ardakan, and Imam Ja’far Sadiq Hospital in Meibod who sincerely cooperated with researchers during the completion of this research project.
Authors’ contribution
AE; the concept, design, data analysis, and manuscript preparation. KHN; Study design, statistical analysis, manuscript editing, and manuscript review. SM and SAA; data collection.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declared no competing interests.
Ethical considerations
Ethical issues (including plagiarism, misconduct, data fabrication, falsification, double publication or submission, redundancy) have been completely observed by the authors.
Funding/Support
This study was supported by the Deputy of Research of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences (Grant # 3584).
References
表
Table 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Gender | 0.004 | |||
| Male | 7 (17.5%) | 26 (44.8%) | 21 (51.2%) | |
| Female | 33 (82.5%) | 32 (55.2%) | 20 (48.8%) | |
| Age group | 0.032 | |||
| 15-40 | 7 (17.5%) | 7 (17.1%) | 3 (5.2%) | |
| 40-60 | 15 (37.5%) | 8 (19.5%) | 27 (46.6%) | |
| 60+ | 18 (45.0%) | 26 (63.4%) | 28 (48.3%) |
Table 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
| FBS (mg/dL) | 124.35 | 146.90 | 158.24 | 0.077 |
| BUN (mg/dL) | 139.57 | 126.92 | 125.44 | 0.256 |
| Cr (mg/dL) | 8.092 | 7.158 | 7.410 | 0.193 |
| Iron (ng/dL) | 71.32 | 82.47 | 70.46 | 0.602 |
| Hb (g/dL) | 10.747 | 10.459 | 10.973 | 0.349 |
| Kt/V | 1.198 | 1.134 | 1.225 | 0.238 |
| URR (%) | 63.93 | 63.64 | 63.66 | 0.988 |
Table 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Diabetes | 19 (47.5%) | 32 (55.2%) | 23 (56.1%) | 0.687 |
| Hypertension | 22 (55%) | 35 (60.3%) | 25 (61.0%) | 0.829 |
| Cardiovascular | 4 (10.0%) | 7 (12.1%) | 4 (9.8%) | 0.919 |
| Hepatitis B | 2 (5.0%) | 1 (1.7%) | 1 (2.4%) | 0.622 |
| Hepatitis C | 1 (2.4%) | 2 (5.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0.244 |
参考文献 (34)
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled
- Untitled