Skip to main content
SleepCited

Description and Disposition of Patients With Cancer Accessing a Novel, Pharmacist-Led Cannabis Consultation Service.

Maria Marchese, Catherine Zhu, L Flay Charbonneau, Christine Peragine, Carlo De Angelis
Other JCO oncology practice 2022 3 citações
PubMed DOI
<\/script>\n
`; }, get iframeSnippet() { const domain = 'sleepcited.com'; const params = 'pmid\u003D35609230'; return ``; }, get activeSnippet() { return this.method === 'script' ? this.scriptSnippet : this.iframeSnippet; }, copySnippet() { navigator.clipboard.writeText(this.activeSnippet).then(() => { this.copied = true; setTimeout(() => { this.copied = false; }, 2000); }); } }" @keydown.escape.window="open = false" @click.outside="open = false">

Embed This Widget

Style



      
      
    

Widget powered by . Free, no account required.

Study Design

Tipo de Estudo
Observational Study
População
Cancer patients accessing pharmacist-led cannabis
Intervenção
Description and Disposition of Patients With Cancer Accessing a Novel, Pharmacist-Led Cannabis Consultation Service. None
Comparador
None
Desfecho Primário
Access patterns for cancer patients
Direção do Efeito
Mixed
Risco de Viés
Moderate

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Cannabis Consultation Service (CCS) is an innovative pharmacist-led resource at the Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre. Its mandate is to provide education and guide patients through access and appropriate use of high-quality plant-derived cannabinoids (PDCs). Our objective was to describe the CCS, explain its processes, and characterize patient disposition with respect to use of PDCs. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients referred to the CCS from July 13, 2020, to March 05, 2021. We used descriptive statistics to report on the patient population and service metrics. RESULTS: During the 34-week period, 96 patients accessed the CCS (median age, 61 years). The top reasons for CCS consultation were management of cancer pain, insomnia, and general interest. Medical cannabis was supported as an option in 44/96 patients. Reasons for not supporting PDC use included lack of indication, potential drug interaction/contraindication, or requiring treatment with first-line therapy. Of the 40 patients requiring a medical document, 22 initiated therapy. The most common product used was a 2:50 THC:CBD (Tetrahydrocannabinol:Cannabidiol) cannabis oil. At the date of last contact, few patients remained on therapy because of lack of benefit, patient choice, and/or hesitancy. CONCLUSION: Despite patients with cancer having interest in seeking PDCs for symptom management, only a few initiated and continued therapy. Pharmacists have an opportunity to advise patients and the oncology team on the risks and benefits of PDCs. These results can be used to support the development of medical cannabis programs by oncology centers and focus future research priorities.

Resumo Rápido

Despite patients with cancer having interest in seeking PDCs for symptom management, only a few initiated and continued therapy and these results can be used to support the development of medical cannabis programs by oncology centers and focus future research priorities.

Used In Evidence Reviews

Similar Papers